Skip to content

Rebuilding my corner of the internet

Personal websites are useful because they do not need to justify themselves to a feed. They can be incomplete, oddly specific, and quiet for long stretches of time.

I wanted a place where the shape of the work could follow the shape of my attention. That meant removing more machinery than I added.

Fewer moving parts

The useful question was not which tool could do the most. It was which set of tools I could still understand after leaving the project alone for six months.

A small site should be easy to return to. Its structure should explain itself, its content should remain portable, and publishing should feel closer to saving a file than operating a system.

A place that can age

The web rewards constant motion, but a personal archive benefits from patience. Old posts should remain findable. Links should keep working. The design should tolerate new interests without requiring a reinvention every season.

That is the kind of corner I am trying to build: not finished, but durable enough to keep changing.